Prompt Engineering for Engineers

Yes, but the useful part is not clever wording: it is defining what a correct answer looks like and testing the prompt against it. Anthropic's own documentation for Claude says that before prompt engineering you should have a clear definition of the success criteria for your use case and some way to test empirically against those criteria. That is the habit this course builds, ending with a prompt that is checked against a golden set and given a score.

Run it against a fixed set of inputs whose correct outputs you already know, and score how many it gets right. OpenAI's developer documentation calls these tests evals and describes them as testing model outputs to ensure they meet style and content criteria that you specify. In the course you test a prompt against ten or more cases with known answers, iterate to a score, and score a tag-list converter by exact match.

Give it the source data, tell it to use only that data, and give it an explicit way to say that information is missing. Anthropic's guide to reducing hallucinations recommends allowing the model to say "I don't know", grounding answers in direct quotes and verifying claims with citations, and notes that these techniques reduce hallucinations but do not eliminate them. The course applies the same idea with rules that stop invention when documents and code are generated from data tables, so you still check the output before you trust it.

No. It works in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot or any model through an API, and the point is the discipline — specifying, constraining and testing — not the tool. Every module ends with a prompt you keep.

Not for ten of the twelve modules. The scoring examples use a few lines of Python that are given to you; if you have never coded, paste them or score by hand in a spreadsheet.

You take one document you actually produce — a FAT report section, a procedure, a fault-code guide — build the prompt that generates it from a table, test it against ten or more cases with known answers, iterate to a score, and write it up as a prompt-library entry a colleague could reuse. A second short project scores a tag-list converter by exact match.

No. Any free chat tool works for most modules, and the scoring modules use OpenRouter's free models with a free key.

Yes. Every module, practice task, project and assessment. You create an account so your progress is saved and the assessments can be marked. The certificate is the only paid item, and only if you want it.

An EDWartens Certificate of Completion, issued when you have finished the modules and passed the final assessment (the project is optional practice), with a verification code anyone can check. It is not a vendor credential and is never described as one.

The creators named in the Credits block at the foot of this page, on their own YouTube channels. EDWartens did not make the videos and the creators are not affiliated with EDWartens. What EDWartens wrote is the study plan, the notes, the practice tasks, the projects and the assessments.

Yes. Learning costs ₹0 in India: every module, the written notes, the practice tasks and the final assessment, with no card and no trial period. The only paid item is the optional EDWartens Certificate of Completion, ₹499 including GST for this beginner course, paid in rupees through Razorpay, and only if you want it after passing the final assessment.